Blog

  • Recovered Writing, Unpublished Fiction Review of Marleen S. Barr’s Oy Pioneer!

    This latest recovered writing is a 749-word book review of Marleen S. Barr’s first novel Oy Pioneer! that I wrote back in 2006 when I was a masters student at the University of Liverpool. I tried unsuccessfully to get the review published at the time.

    Before writing the review, I had met Marleen at the 2006 Science Fiction Research Association conference in White Plains, New York–the first big conference that I presented at. I was on the same panel with her and the SFRA President Dave Mead. They were both kind to me and offered encouragement, but Marleen really took me under her wing. After I got back to Atlanta, I purchased Marleen’s novel from Amazon on 17 July 2006. I shipped her novel with some other books to Liverpool, which is where I read it and wrote the review below–going through several drafts.

    We haven’t published the program yet for the Ninth Annual City Tech Science Fiction Symposium, but it’s safe for me to say that Marleen will be giving the keynote address at this year’s event and we are certainly lucky for it!


    Jason W. Ellis

    Book Review of Marleen S. Barr’s Oy Pioneer!

    29 October 2006

    Estranging Slipstream Narrative in Barr’s Oy Pioneer!

    Marleen S. Barr’s first novel, Oy Pioneer!1is a fantastical romp (both literally and figuratively) that follows the trials and escapades of professor Sondra Lear, a feminist science fiction (SF) scholar. Sondra employs wit and panache to take on a second German Fulbright, maternal niggling, a husband hunt (related to the niggling), and a backwater state university deserving of air attacks straight out of Star Wars. The text is constructed with verisimilar elements taken from Barr’s own life mixed with a heavy dose of comedy, postmodern remixing, SF, and the fantastic.

    Barr creates a work of slipstream fiction in writing Oy Pioneer!, because it is an estranging fictional work that is situated at a crossroads of genres including anonymous memoir, comedy, SF, and fantasy. Additionally, it is the estrangement that Barr generates that makes this novel so compelling and difficult to put down.

    The author maintains two types of estrangement throughout the text. The first is the estrangement that Sondra encounters in everyday life. This takes the form of cultural alienation while visiting foreign countries for work and conferences, as well as the preternatural ability of her mother, who Sondra comically calls Herbert,2 to almost literally reach out and touch her when it is least convenient or appropriate. The second form of estrangement arrives from a vector of the fantastic. Sondra’s life is bombarded by science fictional and fantasy elements throughout the narrative, but these images culminate into a climax of cultural icons in the last third of the novel. This includes cavorting with flying vampires, strafing backwater state universities in X-Wing starfighters, and living with a talking horse.

    In parallel with Barr’s estrangement are story elements that academics and non-academics, inclusive of both men and women, can identify with. This parallel thread is Sondra’s search for a husband. However, it is this universally acknowledged search for a mate, which Barr once again estranges from the normal through comedic situations and fantastic departures. Despite the disconnect between Sondra’s rendezvous and an average reader’s assumptions about dating in the here-and-now, there is still material with which Barr’s audience can connect to. There are professional entanglements with former partners, juggling a professional career and a personal life, as well as keeping her mother’s interminable harassment at bay.

    For the male reader, there is another level of estrangement that obviously comes from the fact that the novel is written by a woman about a woman, who shares many professional and personal characteristics with the author. On the one hand, the novel reveals how one woman, the character Sondra, acts and thinks in the wild and mixed-up world in which she exists. On the other, the book reveals much about a woman, the author, who I have only met once at an academic conference. In a sense, the novel is analogous to an anonymously written blog that seems eerily closer to fact than fiction. However, it is this destabilizing realization that attracts the reader to continue reading the blog, or in this case, the novel.

    I realize that my academic trajectory is far different from that of Barr and her novel’s protagonist, Sondra, but as a beginning scholar, I find this novel interesting to read also for the estranging reality of academia. This novel is like a Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy for academic scholars and in particular, feminist SF scholars. In between the lines, I clearly made out the phrase, “Don’t Panic!”

    I recommend Oy Pioneer! to anyone with a sense of humor, as well as humanities academics. Barr’s work of slipstream fiction is laudable for doubly being so. First, it combines the memoir, comedy, SF, and fantasy into a cohesive work that supplies laughs and dizziness brought about by cognitive estrangement. Additionally, it slips through potentially rocky streams of readers’ assumptions that might come about, because a feminist SF scholar wrote the novel about a feminist SF scholar. Therefore, Barr accomplishes a great feat by using slipstream narrative to tell the whimsical story of Sondra Lear that engages an educated readership comprised of both women and men alike, which assuredly will enjoy such an entertaining novel!

    1 Barr, Marleen S., Oy Pioneer! (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2003).

    2 Admittedly, I am on a first name basis with my father, Bud, and I called my maternal grandmother by her first name, Wilma. However, my mother insisted that I always call her, “Mom.”

  • The Poet Versus Generative AI

    an anthropomorphic cat wearing 18th century garb in front of a background of rolling hills and trees
    Image created with Stable Diffusion.

    Brian Porter and Edouard Machery’s “AI-generated poetry is indistinguishable from human-written poetry and is rated more favorably,” which appears in the open-access journal Scientific Reports, is a fascinating study about how human-made and Generative AI-made poetry is rated by non-expert humans. Interestingly, the study participants rated more of the Generative Ai-made poetry as more “human” than the poems actually written by humans, which included works by Geoffrey Chaucer, William Shakespeare, Samuel Butler, Lord Byron, Walt Whitman, Emily Dickinson, T.S. Eliot, Allen Ginsberg, Sylvia Plath, and Dorothea Lasky. While this quantitative approach provides some interesting talking points about the products of Generative AI, it seems like it might be saying more about the participants than the computer-generated poems. What might the results look like from experts, literature graduate students, and undergraduate students who had taken a class on poetry? What might be revealed by analyzing the AI-penned poems in relation to the work by the respective poets, considering that the prompt was very generic?

  • Generative AI and Pedagogy Bibliography Updates

    an anthropomorphic cat professor is reading books in a library
    Image created with Stable Diffusion.

    Over the weekend, I added a pile of books to the Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Pedagogy Bibliography and Resource List.

    Also, I added some must-read open-access articles and online guides:

  • Be Prepared With a Compact First Aid Kit

    a ziploc full of first aid supplies and a small packet of tissues

    The most important lesson that I learned in the Boy Scouts is “Be Prepared.” I can’t count how many times being prepared has helped me or someone around me–usually in small ways, but occasionally in big ways.

    One of the ways that I maintain preparedness is keeping an individual first aid kit (IFAK) on my person. My full kit fits inside a small MOLLE pouch that I keep in my backpack, but within that kit is a smaller pouch of core components that is small enough that I can slip it into a pocket if I’m not wearing my backpack.

    I would recommend making a small kit like this to keep on your person. It’s easy to do using things you likely already have on-hand. When you or someone around you needs something in it, you’ll be thankful for investing a little bit of time, energy, and materials to be ready for that moment.

    a grid layout of first aid kit contents: pills, pouches, bandaids, eye drops, and tissues

    You can put whatever you think is most useful into your compact first aid kit. In mine, I carry things that I regularly use or think might be useful. I keep my kit in a waterproof snack-size Ziploc bag. It includes:

    • 6 alcohol antiseptic pads
    • 2 lens wipes
    • 2 bandaids
    • 2 aspirin
    • 1 antibiotic ointment
    • 3 single-use eye drops
    • 4 Advil (ibuprofen)
    • 4 Eve DX (a Japanese-made pain reliever that helps with migraines)

    In addition to the first aid kit, I also keep a pouch of tissues (my current Japanese-made Sumikkogurashi ones were donated by Y).

    Whatever you put in your first aid kit, stick to what fits your needs. Keep it up to date as you use things in it. And, adjust its contents as your needs change.

    a ziploc full of first aid supplies and a small packet of tissues
  • MRE Peanut Butter Dessert Bar

    MRE peanut butter dessert bar

    One thing that I haven’t shared on my blog before is my love for USGI Meal, Ready to Eat, or MREs (though, I have mentioned them in passing). While I keep some on-hand for emergencies, I genuinely enjoy eating them. I recently purchased some pulled items and two cases of A and B menus, so I thought that I would share some photos and thoughts while I work my way through them.

    This post shows my second favorite dessert option: the Peanut Butter Dessert Bar (my favorite dessert is the Cherry Blueberry Cobbler). This dessert easily won me over, because I love peanut butter. I have it nearly every day with my breakfast–a spoonful added to a 1/4 cup of oatmeal.

    I bought 12 of these peanut butter bars as stand-alone items. This one was produced by Sterling Foods out of San Antonio, Texas with a date code of 1301, which translates to Oct. 21, 2021. The bar has a compact size–about the same as a flattened Snickers bar, and it packs in 240 calories! It is firm but a little pliable. It has a smooth texture with some crunchy nut bits mixed into it. It hit the spot after a Chinese takeout dinner of spicy beef and onion.

    See the pictures below for its original condition and packaging.

    MRE peanut butter dessert bar
    MRE peanut butter dessert bar
    MRE peanut butter dessert bar