
Please keep in mind that new technology like Generative AI (Gen AI) shouldn’t simply make your thinking or work easier, much less take the place of the uniquely singular abilities of human beings to grow cognitively, think creatively, or evaluate critically. If you use Gen AI to simply avoid work, you are doing it wrong. Instead, using Gen AI in the spirit of Douglas Engelbart’s “augmenting human intelligence” and Donna Haraway’s configuration of the cyborg point the way to beneficial heightening of human possibility instead of harmful erasure of the cognitive distinctions of humanity. If you use Gen AI, use it wisely and use it well. This is the second post in this series.
Gen AI can be a powerful ally when it comes to organizing ideas into a coherent structure. By creating outlines for essays, presentations, or projects, Gen AI provides a framework that students can refine and personalize. This process reflects the cyborg’s ability to integrate technology into their workflow, enhancing productivity without sacrificing creativity.
For example, a student tasked with writing a research paper on artificial intelligence ethics could ask an AI tool to generate several outline versions, each prioritizing different aspects of the topic. They might compare these structures and then decide which one aligns best with their arguments and evidence. If the student hasn’t yet done the requisite beginning research, these outlines can point them toward the kinds of resources that they should find and read via their library.
The key is to treat AI-generated outlines as a starting point rather than a rigid template. Students should feel free to modify, discard, or combine elements to suit their unique voice and vision. And importantly, one can return to the planning stage after learning more and adding that to their query to the Gen AI to further refine the organization of their project.







