Tag: Liverpool

  • Project Board at the University of Liverpool

    a felt covered corkboard with three columns of index cards pinned to its surface .

    I mentioned this to my students the other day, but I wasn’t able to find a photo of what I was talking about. Now I have, so I’ll show it to them in class tomorrow.

    This is my project board while I was an MA student at the University of Liverpool. My monk’s cell had a felt-covered corkboard that I repurposed as a project scheduler by writing upcoming work and ideas on 3″ x 5″ index cards and pinning them into one of three columnar categories: Course Work, or assignments and readings in my classes; Commitments, or work product deliverables like writing a book review or preparing a conference presentation; and Thinking About, or projects and ideas that I was considering but hadn’t committed myself to yet.

    This board was the key to my academic success at that time, because it gave me a way of tracking the work that I had coming up and I could see at a glance from my desk what needed to be prioritized to keep my output going.

    Over time, the board became quite full of index cards. It was always satisfying to take a card off the board when that task had been completed.

    Using a daily planner or a calendar app can serve a similar purpose. Whatever method and tool that works best for you, make a commitment to stick with it so that it can keep you on track for success.

  • Recovered Writing, Unpublished Fiction Review of Marleen S. Barr’s Oy Pioneer!

    This latest recovered writing is a 749-word book review of Marleen S. Barr’s first novel Oy Pioneer! that I wrote back in 2006 when I was a masters student at the University of Liverpool. I tried unsuccessfully to get the review published at the time.

    Before writing the review, I had met Marleen at the 2006 Science Fiction Research Association conference in White Plains, New York–the first big conference that I presented at. I was on the same panel with her and the SFRA President Dave Mead. They were both kind to me and offered encouragement, but Marleen really took me under her wing. After I got back to Atlanta, I purchased Marleen’s novel from Amazon on 17 July 2006. I shipped her novel with some other books to Liverpool, which is where I read it and wrote the review below–going through several drafts.

    We haven’t published the program yet for the Ninth Annual City Tech Science Fiction Symposium, but it’s safe for me to say that Marleen will be giving the keynote address at this year’s event and we are certainly lucky for it!


    Jason W. Ellis

    Book Review of Marleen S. Barr’s Oy Pioneer!

    29 October 2006

    Estranging Slipstream Narrative in Barr’s Oy Pioneer!

    Marleen S. Barr’s first novel, Oy Pioneer!1is a fantastical romp (both literally and figuratively) that follows the trials and escapades of professor Sondra Lear, a feminist science fiction (SF) scholar. Sondra employs wit and panache to take on a second German Fulbright, maternal niggling, a husband hunt (related to the niggling), and a backwater state university deserving of air attacks straight out of Star Wars. The text is constructed with verisimilar elements taken from Barr’s own life mixed with a heavy dose of comedy, postmodern remixing, SF, and the fantastic.

    Barr creates a work of slipstream fiction in writing Oy Pioneer!, because it is an estranging fictional work that is situated at a crossroads of genres including anonymous memoir, comedy, SF, and fantasy. Additionally, it is the estrangement that Barr generates that makes this novel so compelling and difficult to put down.

    The author maintains two types of estrangement throughout the text. The first is the estrangement that Sondra encounters in everyday life. This takes the form of cultural alienation while visiting foreign countries for work and conferences, as well as the preternatural ability of her mother, who Sondra comically calls Herbert,2 to almost literally reach out and touch her when it is least convenient or appropriate. The second form of estrangement arrives from a vector of the fantastic. Sondra’s life is bombarded by science fictional and fantasy elements throughout the narrative, but these images culminate into a climax of cultural icons in the last third of the novel. This includes cavorting with flying vampires, strafing backwater state universities in X-Wing starfighters, and living with a talking horse.

    In parallel with Barr’s estrangement are story elements that academics and non-academics, inclusive of both men and women, can identify with. This parallel thread is Sondra’s search for a husband. However, it is this universally acknowledged search for a mate, which Barr once again estranges from the normal through comedic situations and fantastic departures. Despite the disconnect between Sondra’s rendezvous and an average reader’s assumptions about dating in the here-and-now, there is still material with which Barr’s audience can connect to. There are professional entanglements with former partners, juggling a professional career and a personal life, as well as keeping her mother’s interminable harassment at bay.

    For the male reader, there is another level of estrangement that obviously comes from the fact that the novel is written by a woman about a woman, who shares many professional and personal characteristics with the author. On the one hand, the novel reveals how one woman, the character Sondra, acts and thinks in the wild and mixed-up world in which she exists. On the other, the book reveals much about a woman, the author, who I have only met once at an academic conference. In a sense, the novel is analogous to an anonymously written blog that seems eerily closer to fact than fiction. However, it is this destabilizing realization that attracts the reader to continue reading the blog, or in this case, the novel.

    I realize that my academic trajectory is far different from that of Barr and her novel’s protagonist, Sondra, but as a beginning scholar, I find this novel interesting to read also for the estranging reality of academia. This novel is like a Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy for academic scholars and in particular, feminist SF scholars. In between the lines, I clearly made out the phrase, “Don’t Panic!”

    I recommend Oy Pioneer! to anyone with a sense of humor, as well as humanities academics. Barr’s work of slipstream fiction is laudable for doubly being so. First, it combines the memoir, comedy, SF, and fantasy into a cohesive work that supplies laughs and dizziness brought about by cognitive estrangement. Additionally, it slips through potentially rocky streams of readers’ assumptions that might come about, because a feminist SF scholar wrote the novel about a feminist SF scholar. Therefore, Barr accomplishes a great feat by using slipstream narrative to tell the whimsical story of Sondra Lear that engages an educated readership comprised of both women and men alike, which assuredly will enjoy such an entertaining novel!

    1 Barr, Marleen S., Oy Pioneer! (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2003).

    2 Admittedly, I am on a first name basis with my father, Bud, and I called my maternal grandmother by her first name, Wilma. However, my mother insisted that I always call her, “Mom.”

  • Juggling in England

    Juggler in action in a dynamic crowd of people

    This is one of the most dynamic photos that I’ve ever taken, and I made it completely by accident. In 2006, I saw this juggler across the way from where I was walking with friends in England. I targeted the focus on the juggler with my old Panasonic LUMIX camera. Thankfully, the camera kept the shutter open long enough to capture the action of the crowd around the juggler doing his thing.

  • Albert Einstein by Jacob Epstein

    sculpture of albert einstein's head

    I saw this bust of Albert Einstein by Jacob Epstein in the Walker Art Gallery in Liverpool, England in 2006. There’s a total of six castings of this bust. Another is located in Cambridge at The Fitzwilliam Museum.

  • Reexamining “The Wolves in the Walls”

    Program book and ticket for "The Wolves in the Walls" stage adaptation of the book by Neil Gaiman and DAve McKean. Messy desk in the background.

    Recently, I ran across the image above of the program book and ticket of the stage adaptation of “The Wolves in the Walls,” based on the book of the same title by Neil Gaiman and Dave McKean on my desk in Liverpool. It gave me pause.

    I wrote the short summary below , after seeing it in the fall of 2006:

    It’s about a girl named Lucy, who likes to draw. She lives with her mum who makes jam, her dad who plays the tuba, and her brother who plays video games. One day, Lucy begins to hear wolves in the walls. At first, her family doesn’t believe her, but then the wolves come out and it’s all over! Pandemonium breaks loose and Lucy must brave the wolves to regain her pig puppet from the clutches of the crazy wolves.

    The recent allegations against Gaiman made me think of the theatrical adaptation and source material in a completely skewed and disorienting way. Its difficult now to square my before and after interpretations.

    It’s challenging to ignore what shouldn’t, according to Roland Barthes in “The Death of the Author” (1967), matter as far as how we interpret the text. We, the readers, shouldn’t give an author tyranny over our interpretation of a text. Yet, Gaiman is an author who has cultivated a public persona that dovetails with the positive interpretations of his creative work and associated social causes. Joss Whedon also comes to mind in terms of the close connection between auteur, themes, and social causes, and what happens when the auteur’s behavior conflicts with the constructed persona. Of course, these public personae are created, cultivated, supported, and accepted, but the person beneath the persona is far more complicated and potentially far different than the persona circulating in culture. The author’s behavior might be reprehensible and seem radically different from what the audience has come to expect from the author’s persona. A problem for the reader and critic is to disentangle the linkages between the work, persona, and person in order to provide richer interpretations as opposed to those dominated by the author, persona, or both. Of course, what Gaiman has been alleged to have done must be addressed and remedied in other ways.