Category: Pedagogy

  • Have You Seen Space Station L-4, the 1977 Educational Earth Sciences Program by Children’s Television International?

    From L to R: V-2 Rocket, WAC Corporal Sounding Rocket, Skylab Orbital Workshop, and V-1 Cruise Missile (hanging), National Air and Space Museum, Washington, DC, 2008.
    From L to R: V-2 Rocket, WAC Corporal Sounding Rocket, Skylab Orbital Workshop, and V-1 Cruise Missile (hanging), National Air and Space Museum, Washington, DC, 2008.

    My friend Mark and I have been on a decade’s long quest to find copies of Space Station L-4 (1977), an educational Earth Sciences television program produced, written, and directed by Paul Lally, who I interviewed in 2013 about the show, and distributed by Children’s Television International (CTI).

    Unfortunately, we have not yet been able to obtain copies of Space Station L-4.

    Obvious starting places like Google, YouTube, Bing, Yandex, etc. yield no video, screenshots, or substantive information.

    I’ve tried interlibrary loan requests without any success.

    There was a mention 6 years ago on Reddit’s r/ForgottenTV that linked to my interview with Paul Lally with a couple of commenters mentioning their fond memories of the show.

    Most recently, I discovered video order directories including Bowker’s Complete Video Directory and The Video Source Book in the Internet Archive that list the series and individual episodes, which were available for order from CTI in Virginia (apparently no longer exists and a more recent San Diego address seems defunct but there is a branch of this organization that seems to remain incorporated in Maryland) and GPN in Lincoln, NE (also no longer exists–the owner retired). I am sending letters to the agent listed for the Maryland branch of CTI and Steve Lenzen of GPN in the hope of them having stock available or a reference to who might have tapes for sale.

    Below, I’m pasting the series and episode information from Bowker’s Complete Video Directory 1998, pp. 2158-2159 in the hope that it might lead someone with info about how to obtain the series to my website and who would be kind enough to reach out by email to my address in the info box to the right or via my social media links on the About page.

    Space Station L-4. 16 cass. (1977). Science—Environmental Studies. 240 min. Rights: Group; Broadcast. Viewers imagine themselves on space station L-4, 440 miles above the earth. Their mission: to study & monitor life support systems for planet Earth & share this information with all countries needing assistance. By dramatically demonstrating modern equipment, techniques & methods of scientific investigation this video teaches how we are seeking to safeguard the future of our natural environment & prepare for human survival. GPN. tchr's. guide: $3.50; VHS, Set (Order #: E374):
    $351.20.
    
    Space Station L-4, Vol. 1: The Changing Earth; Earth Measurement; Atmosphere; Water. Science—General. B&W and Color. 60 min. Juvenile.Ages: 9-13. G. Made-for-Video Movie. Children’s Television International. VHS (Order #: ST-1): $79.95.
    
    Space Station L-4, No. 1: The Changing Earth. (1977). Science—Environmental Studies. 15 min, Rights: Group; Broadcast. Develops an awareness within students that the earth is constantly changing. GPN. tchr's. guide: $3.50; VHS (Order #: E374): $29.95.
    
    Space Station L-4, Vol. 2: Soil; Earth Limits; Energy; Gravity. Science—General. B&W and Color. 60 min. Juvenile.Ages: 9-13. G. Made-for-Video Movie. Children’s Television International. VHS (Order #: ST-2): $79.95.
    
    Space Station L-4, No. 2: Earth Measurement. (1977). Technology. 15 min. Rights: Group; Broadcast. Demonstrates how technological advances enable us to increase the accuracy of measurements. GPN. tchr’s. guide: $3.50; VHS (Order #: E374): $29.95.
    
    Space Station L-4, Vol. 3: Human Life Support; ‘Human Communication; The Order of Nature; Cycles. Science—General. B&W and Color. 60 min. Juvenile Ages: 9-13. G. Made-for-Video Movie. Children's Television International. VHS (Order #: ST-3): $79.95.
    
    Space Station L-4, No. 3: Atmosphere. (1977). ‘Science—Environmental Studies. 15 min. Rights: Group; Broadcast. Helps students understand the effects of the interaction between the earth's surface & living things. GPN. tchr's. guide: $3.50; VHS (Order #: E374): $29.95.
    
    Space Station L-4, Vol. 4: Things in Motion; Reach ‘Up; Reach Out; Reach Far Out. Science—General. B&W and Color. 60 min. Juvenile. Ages: 9-13. G. Made-for-Video Movie. Children’s Television International. VHS (Order #: ST-4): $79.95.
    
    Space Station L-4, No. 4: Water. (1977). Science—Environmental Studies. 15 min. Rights: Group; Broadcast. Presents the interrelationship between water, the earth's surface & living things. GPN. tchr’s. guide: $3.50; VHS (Order #: E374): $29.95.
    
    Space Station L-4, No. 5: Soil. (1977). Science—Environmental Studies. 15 min. Rights: Group; Broadcast. Continues to demonstrate the interrelationship to ecology by looking at how soil, water & living things affect each other. GPN. tchr’s. guide: $3.50; VHS (Order #: E374): $29.95.
    
    Space Station L-4, No. 6: Earth Limits. (1977). Science—Environmental Studies. 15 min. Rights: Group; Broadcast. Shows students that the earth & its components are finite resources. GPN. tchr's. guide: $3.50; VHS (Order #: E374): $29.95.
    
    Space Station L-4, No. 7: Energy. (1977). Science—Environmental Studies. 15 min. Rights: Group; Broadcast. Reveals that the sun is our energy source. GPN. tchr’s. guide: $3.50; VHS (Order #: £374): $29.95
    
    Space Station L-4, No. 8: Gravity. (1977). Science—General. 15 min. Rights: Group; Broadcast. Shows students how man & his environment are both affected by gravity. GPN. tchr's. guide: $3.50; VHS (Order #: E374): $29.95.
    
    Space Station L-4, No. 9: Human Life Support. (1977). Science—Environmental Studies. 15 min. Rights: Group; Broadcast. Makes us aware that we all interact with our environment. GPN. tchr’s. guide: $3.50; VHS (Order #: E374): $29.95.
    
    Space Station L-4, No. 10: Human Communications. (1977). Anthropology. 15 min. Rights: Group; Broadcast. Develops an awareness of humans as communicators. GPN. tchr's. guide: $3.50: VHS (Order #: E374): $29.95.
    
    Space Station L-4, No. 11: The Order of Nature. (1977). Science—Environmental Studies. 15 min. Rights: Group; Broadcast. Promotes the observable patterns in nature. GPN. tchr’s. guide: $3.50; VHS (Order #: E374): $29.95.
    
    Space Station L-4, No. 12: Cycles. (1977). Science—Environmental Studies. 15 min. Rights: Group; Broadcast. Develops student understanding of physical & biological cycles that naturally occur. GPN. tchr’s. guide: $3.50; VHS (Order #: E374): $29.95.
    
    Space Station L-4, No. 13: Things in Motion. (1977). Science—-Environmental Studies. 15 min. Rights: Group; Broadcast. Helps students understand that we increase our use of fuels as we explore space. GPN. tchr's. guide: $3.50; VHS (Order #: E374): $29.95.
    
    Space Station L-4, No. 14: Reach Up. (1977). Science—Environmental Studies. Exploration. 15 min. Rights: Group, Broadcast. Demonstrates how we have increased our knowledge of the environment through space exploration. GPN. tchr's. guide: $3.50; VHS (Order #: E374): $29.95.
    
    Space Station L-4, No. 15: Reach Out. (1977). Science—Environmental Studies. Space Exploration. 15 min. Rights: Group; Broadcast. Enables viewers to better understand how our explorations of space have actually changed the dimensions of environmental research. GPN. tchr's guide: $3.50; VHS (Order #: E374): $29.95
    
    Space Station L-4, No. 16: Reach Far Out. (1977). Science—Astronomy. Space Exploration. 15 min. Rights: Group; Broadcast. Takes viewers one step further in the search & inquiry process by showing how we are looking for life in outerspace. GPN. tchr’s. guide: $3.50; VHS (Order #:E374): $29.95.

    If you know where I might find a copy of Space Station L-4, please send me an email at my address to the right or via my social media links on the About page. Thank you!

  • September 2023 Updates to the Generative AI and Pedagogy Bibliography Page

    An anthropomorphic cat dressed like a professor in a tweed jacket, sitting at a desk with papers in front of him. Shelves of books behind him. Image created with Stable Diffusion.

    Since posting the original version of my Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Pedagogy Bibliography and Resource List in April 2023, I have continued to add resources that I find through my research and daily online reading. I’ve added 61 articles and books to the bibliography since August 2023 for a total of 382 MLA-formatted references. Also, it has 55 online groups and resources linked at the bottom. Whenever you access the bibliography, you can check the bottom of the page to see if I’ve recently updated it–I always add the date for any updates.

    I hope that the bibliography might be useful to you! If there’s something that my bibliography is missing, send me an email (details in the “Who is Dynamic Subspace” widget to the right) or connect with me on social media (links on my About page).

  • Academic Office Evolution 2012-Present

    In my post-PhD academic career, I’ve had two offices–one at the Georgia Institute of Technology and one at the New York City College of Technology, CUNY. Both were/are in shared office spaces. Thankfully, the desks were not shared (a loathsome experience that I had at Mindspring years ago), so I can keep my things on my desk without concern someone will move them or mess with them. Since I spend so much of my life at work, I like to make these spaces my own to make myself and perhaps others happy to be in their proximity. I’ve combed through my photo collection to find the following snapshots of my office spaces over the years.

    2012-2014, Georgia Institute of Technology

    Fall 2013

    The Brittain Fellows’ office space in the Col. Stephen C. Hall Building has an open floor plan in large rooms with each Brittain Fellow getting a large cubical space with cabinets and shelving. This was a great place to work, collaborate with colleagues, and interact with students during office hours.

    By Fall 2013, I had put up some favorite posters of LEGO LOTR, The Beastie Boys (not realizing that this could foreshadow where I was going next!), and the Philip K. Dick conference that I presented at in Dortmund, Germany. I had some favorite Star Wars LEGO sets and a cool Japanese-imported Iron Man snack box.

    2014-Present, New York City College of Technology, CUNY

    Fall 2014

    This picture shows my office space within the six-person office that I share at City Tech after I first moved some things in at the beginning of the Fall 2014 semester. Each faculty member gets an allotted square footage of office space within a larger room shared with other faculty members. I have a great cohort of office mates who I have found to be collegial, collaborative, and supportive. It was agreed before I was hired that this office would not employ cubical walls, which might lend itself to a more open atmosphere of conversation and co-working than in other office areas with cubical dividers or fewer number of faculty members.

    Within the next month of Fall 2014, I had added posters to the wall of an Apple I computer board and Star Wars LEGO sets on my desk and bookshelf.

    By the end of the Fall 2014 semester, I had presented a paper at the annual research poster session, which I proudly displayed above my bookshelf.

    Spring 2015

    At the end of Spring 2015, I connected with Stanley Kaplan, a graduate of City Tech in 1969 who has worked as a lab assistant here since then. He had squirreled away these old computers in the Vorhees building.

    I purchased the polycarbonate utility cart below to ferry these computers from that building to the Namm Building–a distance of several blocks.

    Summer 2015

    By the end of Summer 2015, I had purchased a large utility shelf from Lowes, which I setup to hold most of the vintage computers. I positioned it in my bookshelf’s old space and slid the bookshelf over with a little gap to allow me to reach between my desk and the bookshelf for books on it.

    Spring 2016

    In early Spring 2016, Alan Lovegreen and I received 160 boxes of donated books from an anonymous donor in California. Alan had supervised boxing and loading everything in California, and when he returned to Brooklyn, we brought all of the boxes up to our respective offices. Thanks to our understanding colleagues in both of our offices, we were able to store the boxes until the library had cleared enough shelf space for this initial 600-linear foot donation of near-complete runs of the major SF magazines, novels, monographs, and journals.

    In this wide shot revealing all six desks in our shared office from late Spring 2016, you can see that the books have been moved to the library. My desk is the middle one on the left. Patrick is sitting at his desk in front of mine.

    Spring 2017

    By Spring 2017, I was carrying my MacBook Pro to work, so I cleared the center of my desk and daisy-chained the two Dell monitors (I hadn’t used my City Tech-issued Dell desktop since 2014–it’s not pictured here because by this point I had locked it away in my filing cabinet at the front wall of the room).

    The LEGO sets on my desk in 2017 were a MOC of Tony Stark’s workshop and Doctor Who’s TARDIS 21304.

    Also, I use the computers beside my desk to show off some of the postcards that Y and I receive via Postcrossing, which I’ve written about here and here. Admittedly, I have convinced some students that I was a distant friend of the British Royal Family with these!

    Spring 2018

    By the beginning of Spring 2018, my desk area had been overrun not only by the vintage computers but also by LEGO sets that my colleague and officemate to the right of this photo had acquired through grants. You can see that we now use the utility cart to move the LEGO sets around to our classes.

    Fall 2018

    Before the beginning of Fall 2018, I had donated my twin Dell monitors to Patrick so that he could have a super-wide 4-monitor setup on his desk. This opened up my desktop workspace considerably!

    Summer 2019

    At the beginning of Summer 2019, my cousin Ryan Cox gifted me his old clamshell iBook for the Retrocomputing Lab.

    Fall 2019

    By Fall 2019, my desk was once again overrun with LEGO sets–mostly Avengers (including my MOC/MOD Avengers Tower on the left) and some Star Wars. I was using my ThinkPad X220 as my work computer in the office and classroom.

    Then, the pandemic happened, and I rarely visited the office.

    Fall 2022

    During the pandemic, we received a sizable donation of books and magazines from Charlie Seelig and others. By Fall 2022, most of the boxes had accumulated in my office. They are in such pristine shape thanks to the United States Postal Service (sarcasm).

    Spring 2023

    At the end Spring 2023, I moved all of the donated boxes of books into the library and shelved most of them as I wrote about here, here, and here on the Science Fiction at City Tech website. While there is still a lot of stuff in my office space, it is tidy and clean while I am away on sabbatical.

    Reflection

    My office space reflects the ebb and flow of my work and projects. It reflects aspects of my life that I choose to share in the workplace with my colleagues and students. Those reflections are also things that I want to see as a reminder of what brings me joy and happiness. Having more than books and office supplies at my desk makes me glad to inhabit this space while I am at work. On occasion, it has brought some happiness to students and colleagues, too.

  • Ten Suggestions on Teaching With/About Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Writing Classroom

    Anthropomorphic cat wearing suit and tie, and standing in front of a chalkboard. Image created with Stable Diffusion.
    Anthropomorphic cat wearing suit and tie, and standing in front of a chalkboard. Image created with Stable Diffusion.

    I’ve been spending a lot of time studying and using generative AI technologies and thinking about their pedagogical implications, and over the summer, I invested more energy into taking intensive online classes relating to generative AI on LinkedIn Learning, which I wrote about here and here. The suggestions below are a distillation of some of the important ideas that I have learned and plan to implement after my sabbatical this year concludes. Readings associated with these points can be found on my extensive generative AI pedagogy bibliography. Maybe you will find some of these helpful to your thinking for your own classes as we make our way into the science fictional future together!

    1. Build ethical and legal issues of generative AI into every discussion and assignment. Of course, a separate module or a whole course can be focused on these topics, but students need to see how ethical and legal issues are tightly woven into how these technologies are developed, the challenges that they present, and how to be prepared to avoid, mitigate, or resolve those challenges. By weaving ethical and legal issues into the quotidian, it helps students think critically about these issues throughout the learning process and it avoids the conclusion that ethics and legal concerns are just an afterthought.
    2. Show students how bias in generative AI is real. Since generative AI is trained on datasets of work created by people, the AI systems will reflect the biases inherent in the content of the dataset and the ways different people might be represented in the dataset (e.g., more books by white male authors and fewer by writers of color or women writers). Bias is unfortunately baked in. Help students explore how these biases reveal themselves insidiously, might be discovered through prompting, and how to mitigate them (if possible) in the way they use generative AI as a part of their workflow.
    3. Help students become responsible generative AI users. Students need to be taught how to document, cite, and acknowledge the use of AI in their work at school and later in the workplace. This can refute earlier use of ChatGPT and similar sites that fueled what some might consider plagiarism or cheating. Helping students see how it’s okay to use these tools when allowed and properly documented helps them see how they are a tool to support their work rather than a way to avoid working.
    4. Reveal how generative AI technologies are designed, developed, and operated. By learning how generative AI is built and deployed, students get to see how the sausage is made. They will learn that generative AI isn’t magical or all knowing or perfect. Instead, they will realize that years of research and development in mathematics and computer science led to the current state of the art with these technologies, which is still lacking. They will discover the limitations of what these technologies offer (e.g., text generating AI primarily performs sentence completion and has no understanding of what it is doing, or its training data has gaps, deficiencies, biases, etc. that directly affect the text generated). This can be paired with lessons on how large language models are trained, how they are a black box in terms of how they work, and initiatives to build explainable artificial intelligence (XAI).
    5. Approach generative AI as another layer for students’ digital literacy development. Considering AI’s biases, falsehoods, so-called hallucinations, and off-topic responses, pairing generative AI with instruction on vetting information, using research tools (online and off), and applying one’s own skepticism will combat the notion of AI’s trustworthiness, expertise, and authoritativeness. Also, it gives students another source for comparing, contrasting, and verifying when checking facts and establishing reliability of various sources of information.
    6. Introduce generative AI as a new tool for students to add to writing and creative workflows. Some students might like to think that generative AI is a one-stop shop, but we can reveal to them how it can support different elements within a larger creative framework that depends on their cognition, imagination, and effort to produce deliverables. It can aid with ideation, brainstorming, planning, and outlining, as well as handling less important writing tasks, such as replying to an email or DM. An important corollary to this is the fact that prompt engineering is a skill unto itself that students have to learn and develop. In some cases, figuring out the best prompt might require more time, energy, and collaboration with others to accomplish than had the students done the writing output themselves.
    7. Refocus on editing, revision, and the writing process to incorporate generative AI text into student work. One way to accomplish this is teaching students higher level editing and revision tasks using AI generated text as the material for editing. Another way is to teach students how to use editing tools, such as those built into Microsoft Word, Google Docs, and LibreOffice, to work with the text generated by AI.
    8. Harness generative AI as a learning tool to support student experimentation and discovery by example. Students can ask the generative AI to summarize their writing, rewrite their writing for different audiences, turn outlines into paragraphs, etc. However, for students to gain some benefit from this, there needs to be a reflective writing exercise that gives the student an opportunity to dissect what the AI did to the student’s original composition and then based on what the student learns in reflection, they attempt their own new composition with the same goal as that given to the generative AI. The AI’s output can be combined with the student’s reflection and composition for evaluation by peers or the instructor, depending on how you are providing feedback to students on their work.
    9. Recognize writing students as technical communicators, because they use generative AI technology in their writing processes. I am thinking of part of the Society for Technical Communication’s definition of tech comm: “Communicating by using technology, such as web pages, help files, or social media sites.” Using AI to create outputs or as a part of the writing process means that students are using technology to communicate in a deeper way than how we might have thought of this before. Acknowledging this with students might make more of them aware of this as a career path or how they might leverage their communication skills as they transition into the workplace.
    10. Warn students about the possible jeopardy they face by providing their writing, prompts, questions, and personal identifying information to online-based generative AI tools like ChatGPT. Anything you type into the system is saved and associated with you. This means that your inputs might be used to train and fine tune future versions of the generative AI system, and the data collected about you based on what you type and how you use the system might be utilized by the system provider or sold to third parties (e.g., for advertising, adjusting insurance rates, making loan decisions, etc.). This can be connected to a larger discussion of how to protect one’s self online, practice privacy best practices, employ obfuscation techniques, etc. Teaching students how to use their own locally hosted LLMs, such as Meta’s LLaMA and its derivatives. This gives them more control over how their data, and it gives them the option to fine tune their local model to better fit their needs.
  • Reflections on a Month of LinkedIn Learning

    Photo of a business cat taking notes in his office. Image created with Stable Diffusion.
    Photo of a business cat taking notes in his office. Image created with Stable Diffusion.

    As I wrote at the beginning of July here, I planned to take advantage of LinkedIn Learning’s free one-month trial. I wanted to report back on my experience of taking LinkedIn Learning courses and provide more details about some of my tips that might help you be more successful with LinkedIn Learning.

    Breakdown of the Courses and Learning Paths

    LibreOffice Calc spreadsheet showing Jason's LinkedIn courses and time totals.

    I created the spreadsheet above in LibreOffice Calc as a list of all of the courses I had completed between June 29 and August 3 (I’m including the end of June courses in the free Career Essentials in Generative AI by Microsoft and LinkedIn that gave me the idea to continue with the free one month trial period). I included the instruction time for each course. This allowed me to calculate that I had completed 43 hours 11 minutes of course instruction across 39 courses during my LinkedIn Learning trial period.

    I regret not keeping track of how long I spent on each course, which was far longer due to pausing the video to write notes, studying notes, taking quizzes, writing assignments, and taking exams. I believe the 50% extra time per course that I wrote about in July holds true.

    I focused on two main areas: Generative AI, which I am building into my workflows and maintaining a pedagogical bibliography for here; and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Communication Best Practices, which I wanted to use to improve my teaching practices by structuring my classroom as supportive and welcoming to all students.

    In the Generative AI courses, I learned about machine learning, different forms of generative AI, how generative AI is integrated (or being integrated) into local and server software, and frameworks for critique of AI systems in terms of ethics, bias, and legality. Also, I took some courses on Python to get an inkling of the code underpinning many AI initiatives today.

    In the DEI Communication Best Practices cluster of courses, I learned helpful terminology, techniques for engagement, what to do to support and include others, and how to be an ally (mostly with an emphasis on the workplace, but thinking about how to leverage these lessons in the classroom). These courses covered combating discrimination, planning accessibility from the beginning and benefit of all, and supporting neurodivergence.

    Overall, each learning experience was beneficial to my understanding of the topic. However, some instructors delivered better courses–for my way of learning–by employing repetition, anchoring key topics with words and definitions on the video (which you can pause and write down), giving more quizzes over shorter amounts of material (instead of fewer quizzes over longer time spans of material), and giving students mini projects or assignments to reinforce the lesson (e..g, pause and write about this, or pause the video, solve this problem, and “report back”–the course isn’t interactive but the “report back” idea is to compare your solution to the instructor’s after the video is played again).

    All of the courses provide a lot of information in a very short amount of time. In some cases, the information compression is Latvian repack level. Even taking notes in shorthand, I could not keep up in some instances. To capture all of the information, I had to pause videos repeatedly, repeat (using the 10 second reply often) and read the transcript.

    While I enjoyed the standalone courses, the Learning Paths provided a sequence and overlap in material that helped reinforce what was being taught. Also, Learning Paths helped me see connections between the broader implications of the topic (e.g., DEI, accessibility, neurodiversity, etc.) as well as explore certain aspects of the topic in more depth (e.g., how to approach conversations on uncomfortable topics or how to ask for permission to be an ally in a given situation).

    Each instructor has a unique way of speaking and engaging the learner. I really enjoyed the diversity of the instructors across all topics.

    The accessibility features built into LinkedIn Learning helped me follow along and make accurate notes. In particular, I always turned on closed captioning and clicked the “Transcript” tab beneath the video so that I could easily follow along and pause the video when there was a keyword or definition or illustration that I wanted to capture in my notes.

    LibreOffice Calc chart showing how many hours of courses were completed on the days between 6/29 and 8/3/2023.

    I added the course instruction time for those courses completed on the same day to generate the chart above that illustrates the ebb and flow of my course completion across the month. In some cases, I spread out the instruction across days to give myself enough time to learn and practice the topics being discussed (e.g., Python programming or Stable Diffusion image generation). There were other days that I paused my learning to work on my research or simply to take a break from learning.

    On LinkedIn Learning, some of the courses are grouped together into what are called Learning Paths, which yield a separate certificate of completion from the certificates that you earn for each individual course. In some cases, as in the Career Essentials in Generative AI by Microsoft and LinkedIn also includes an exam with a time limit (1.5 hours) that must be passed before the Learning Path certificate is given. About 50% or 21 hours 45 minutes of the 43 hour 11 minute course instruction time applied to five earned Learning Paths for me:

    • Career Essentials in Generative AI by Microsoft and LinkedIn, 3h 49m
    • Accessibility and Inclusion Advocates, 3h 18m
    • Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging for All, 6h 16m
    • Responsible AI Foundations, 4h 15m
    • LinkedIn’s AI Academy, 3h 54m

    LinkedIn Learning Success Tips

    Overall, I want to reiterate the tips that I wrote about here for being successful at LinkedIn Learning–both in terms of how you learn and how you demonstrate what you have learned. Below are some reiterated tips with details based on my experience this past month.

    Be an Active Learner: Take Notes, Do the Exercises, and Complete the Quizzes

    Fanned out loose-leaf notes that Jason took during his LinkedIn Courses.

    The one thing that I would like to stress above all others is how important it is to treat a LinkedIn Learning course like a classroom learning experience. What I mean by that is that you need to set aside quality time for learning, free from distraction, where you can take notes and complete the exercises, and study what you’ve learned before taking quizzes or exams. Employing your undivided attention, writing your notes by hand in a notebook, and completing quizzes, exams, and assignments all contribute to your learning, integrating what you’ve learned with your other knowledge, and preparing yourself to recall and apply what you’ve learned in other contexts, such as in a class or the workplace.

    Unless you have eidetic memory, the fact is that you won’t learn a lot by passively watching or listening to courses. And even if you have photographic memory, all you will gain are facts and not the integration, connections, and recall that comes from using and reflecting on what you have learned.

    Remember to Add Certifications to Your LinkedIn Profile

    Jason Ellis's Licenses & Certifications section on his LinkedIn Profile.

    Remember to add each completed LinkedIn Course and Learning Path certification to your profile. They will appear in their own section as they do on mine shown above.

    Completed Courses and Learning Paths do not automatically appear on your profile (consider: someone might not want all of their training to appear on their LinkedIn Profile for a variety of reasons).

    To add a Course or Learning Path to your LinkedIn Profile, go to LinkedIn Learning > click “My Learning” in the upper right corner > click “Learning History” under “My Library” on the left > click the “. . .” to the right of the Course or Learning Path > click “Add to Profile” and follow the prompts.

    LinkedIn also gives you the option to create post on your Profile about your accomplishment, which you should opt to do. When you do this, it auto suggests skills that it will add to your Skills section of your Profile. You can have up to 50 skills on your profile, so keep track of what’s there and prune/edit the list as needed to highlight your capabilities for the kinds of jobs that you are looking for. More on Skills further down the page.

    Add Certifications to Your Resume or CV

    Excerpt image of Jason Ellis' CV. Link to CV below.

    As shown above and viewable on my CV here, I added links to my LinkedIn Course and Learning Path certifications in a dedicated section of my CV. In addition to the unique link to my certifications, I included the organization that issued it (i.e., LinkedIn), and the date of completion. You can do the same on your CV or resume.

    To get the link to a Course or Learning Path completion certificate, go to LinkedIn Learning > click “My Learning” in the upper right corner > click “Learning History” under “My Library” on the left > click the “. . .” to the right of the Course or Learning Path > click “Download certificate” > click “LinkedIn Learning Certificate” > toggle “On” under the top section titled “Create certificate link” > Click “Copy” on the far right.

    While you are here, you can download a PDF of your certificate for safe keeping at the bottom left of this last screen. You can add these PDFs to a professional portfolio or alongside a deliverable that you create based on the skills that you gained from that course to demonstrate your learning and mastery.

    Demonstrate Your Skills

    Jason Ellis' Skills section on his LinkedIn Profile.

    As I mentioned above, when you post about completing a course, LinkedIn Learning can autogenerate relevant skill terms to add to the Skills section on your Profile (as shown above on my Profile). When you have the spare time and focus, you should occasionally click on “Demonstrate skills” (you can do this without a LinkedIn Learning subscription). This gives you options for taking exams related to different skills that you’ve added to your Skills section of your Profile. If you pass, it provides some proof that you know something about that particular skill. Beware though: these exams can be tough. When I took the HTML exam, I discovered big gaps in what I knew from learning HTML years before without keeping up with changes to HTML in the intervening years. While I passed the exam, I made notes about those questions that I got wrong so that I knew what to learn more about to fill in those gaps.

    Also, some skills don’t have exams associated with them. In those cases, you may submit a video or essay to demonstrate your experience to potential recruiters or hiring managers. If you do this, you should plan it out, shoot and edit your video to give the best visual and auditory impression, or write and revise your essay so that it is of the highest professional quality.

    Is It Worth It?

    Looking back on what I learned, how I learned it, and who I learned it from, I’m glad that I invested the time and energy into a month of LinkedIn Learning. I’ve already started putting some of the lessons into practice (e.g., the generative AI and ethical AI courses), and I’m planning out how I will roll out the DEI approaches in my courses when I return to teaching in Fall 2024 (I am on sabbatical this academic year). In the future, I plan to pay for LinkedIn Learning when additional classes are available and I have the time to immerse myself in learning.

    If you’re looking to skill up, I think that LinkedIn Learning can be beneficial if you go into it with a learning and reflective mindset. This means that you are willing to invest your attention, time, energy, and thought to learning the course material, want to reflect on how what you learn connects to other things you’ve already learned through school and work experience, apply what you’ve learned to deliverables that demonstrate you have integrated what you have learned (e.g., a detailed post on your LinkedIn Profile, a blog post, a poster, a video, an addition to your professional portfolio, etc.), and reflect, preferably in writing, on what you’ve learned, how you applied it, what you would like to see yourself accomplish next, and how to take those next steps.

    As I said above, you likely won’t gain much by passively listening to LinkedIn Learning Courses while doing other things or being distracted by your environment. Invest in this form of learning and you will add to what you know and can do. In that spirit, it’s like my Grandpa Ellis used to tell me, “Jake, no one can take away your education!”